• Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    5 days ago

    “May” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. The last third of the article is all about how this is very unlikely to be true. As the saying goes - “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, and this seems like pretty weak evidence.

    Also fuck that headline. iirc usually the article author doesn’t get to write the headline, the editor does that. And often all the editor cares about is grabbing eyeballs

  • Noit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    More or Less covered this a few weeks ago and the short version is that there probably aren’t significantly more people on earth, more that the estimates of where people are (rural vs urban) are incorrect, and as always, more study is needed.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    And here I was just commenting on how huge population centers freak me out, and now there’s even more of you sons of bitches?! Half of you people weren’t here when I was born! Go home or something, get off my lawn.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Every once in awhile I see things about how people are fleeing the city or the state and im like. How are prices still going up when new and denser buildings keep on going up? Somehow everyone is leaving but we keep on filling the increasing supply of housing and its not like homelessness has gone down.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          oh yeah. every time I see that type of stuff I assume there is some bs around it. I’ll believe it when high rises start looking deserted like malls.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s both things. People like me are headed out to the country, most others are just piling up in the cities.

            • HubertManne@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Well the country thing is a more recent phenomenon. I have been hearing about how everyone is leaving the state since the 80’s and it became a political bs talking point. We should be empty by now with the way they have talked over the decades.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, eventually I’ll move out of the city too, but overall as you said the trend is more people moving to cities

              • HubertManne@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean this is a little surprising given wfh thing. You would think the trend would be reveresed. Personally I like a metro system.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I think people often get exhausted with cities at a certain age. I’m starting to want to sacrifice all that I like about the city over the crowdedness and general rudeness you observe while adjacent to so many people.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    “When dams are built, large areas are flooded and people need to be relocated,” Láng-Ritter said in a press statement. “The relocated population is usually counted precisely because dam companies pay compensation to those affected.”

    So the locals are incentivized to inflate their numbers?

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        You could end up with Waking Ned Devine, where everyone in town vouches for everyone else because they all stand to benefit.

    • corvi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      You can’t just say, “I have 20 people living in my home, just make the check out to me.” The dam company is going to be verifying who they’re paying.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The dam company is going to be verifying who they’re paying.

        Are they, though?

        Or are they just going to sign off and pass the bill on to the government?

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Precisely. I’m not buying this one at all. In a third world country, they’re paying peanuts, these companies don’t give a fuck if it’s $50 or $100.