• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He was originally jailed for life but at an appeal doctors told the court the rapes arose of sexual frustration arising out of his marriage to an “ambitious and demanding” wife. The sentence was reduced and he spent only about two years in jail.

    Why are rapists seemingly the only category of offender judges always manage to find sympathy for?

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because the people making the decision are the same ones who are a bad day away from being judged.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Male judges who have experienced similar events in their lives maybe? Rape cases should be judged by a 3 judge court where they must have more than one gender or at least another gender other than the perp.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You could expand that to a general principle for all criminal cases: select one judge that matches the demographics of the defendant as closely as possible, one that matches the victim, and one that differs to an equal degree from both.

        • jonathan7luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It’s an interesting concept, but aside from the scalability issues mentioned, I don’t think demographics are necessarily an indicator of a judge’s biases cough Clarence Thomas cough.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          We’re already significantly short on judges. Requiring judges in triplicate would have some crazy side effects. Court cases currently take too long to resolve due to the shortage. The entire system would grind to a literal standstill.

          • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You could restrict it to cases where the victim and defendant have significantly different demographics, then.