• Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a straight red. You cannot leave your feet like that especially for a two footed tackle. Match ban plus possible further punishment after a pgmol influenced review of the play.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think that is the explanation.

        More likely:
        Linux Mint is based on the LTS variants of Ubuntu, so 26.04 LTS will threaten to make the current Mint base rapidly obsolete.
        So the Mint team has hard times ahead switching to the new base.

        • muzzle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Mint should just switch to Debian as upstream, they already have LMDE anyway.

        • RustyNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          TBF, it’s not the first time the LTS base changes, and it wasn’t a disaster at all.

          Despite, there’s the Debian and Linux mint repos, as well as the entirety of flatpak.

          It will be fine.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Most of Ubuntu is obsolete the day it’s released because of how Ubuntu is structured: the supported Main repository and the unsupported Universe repository (unsupported by Canonical and entirely relying on community members that backport bug fixes in accordance to Canonical’s strict version freeze rules).

          So it’s a coin toss if Universe packages get updates at all and if they do in which time frame. Packages in Universe also are not release blocking, so breakages known ahead of release there are waved through, as happened only very recently with 25.10 and it’s broken Flatpak support.

          So the majority of packages are unsupported and Mint insists to build a newbie targeting distribution out of this and carry ancient packages around for years. The Mint team is already having their hands full with replacing Snap software with their own deb packages, so they don’t have the capacity to deal with all Universe packages. Probably they hope that software for their user base gets updated by an unpaid Ubuntu community member and that unfixed packages are simply not used by their users.

          I think it’s the moral duty of us more knowledgeable people to discourage the use of Mint. If someone wants a Mint distribution, better use LMDE. Otherwise something like a Fedora Spin is probably currently the best newbie friendly option these days.

        • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          LTS variants get mainstream support for five years from release (24.04 gets support until 2029) and you can get extended support for up to another seven years after that (first five of which are free for up to 5 computers).

          I wouldn’t call 8 years “rapidly obsolete”. That’s almost one full Windows. :P

      • rucksack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, the focus will shift, but only the focus of the people who switch distros more often than their underwear.

        I don’t think the actual user numbers change much due to things like this.

      • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ubuntu has so many issues/awkwardness I don’t know why anyone would recommend it to a Mint user.
        Mint gets recommended for its stability, low hardware requirements, and Windows-like UI. Ubuntu is no longer stable as they replaced half of the gnu coreutils by experimental Rust versions, requires a pretty fast internet connection and disk due to snaps, and has every element of the UI in a weird position for a Windows user.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        If that’s unexpected for mint they have not been paying a lot of attention to provide Ubuntu release dates

  • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ew. I’m that guy. So, you’re saying, if someone was finally ready to ditch the corpos, now is not the time to go mint? Apologies for my lack of understanding, but still genuine interest in the topic.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Mint is ugly and they are way behind the n Wayland adoption. Their updater annoys me because you have to double-shot it by updating the update then running it again to get the updates the old updater couldn’t install.

        Otherwise it’s fine.

        Explore fedoras options instead, in particular the KDE ones if you are coming from windows.

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          There are subjective reasons to not like Mint just like there are for every distro.

          I, personally, would not use Mint. But it’s great for a lot of folks.

        • jutty@blendit.bsd.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Mint is a glorious debloat of Ubuntu with several extras and are strategically wise in having LMDE ready and in production. They fill a very important role as an user-friendly not-DIY distro suitable for someone completely unfamiliar with Linux. I wouldn’t describe Fedora that way. It changes too fast for that use case and compared to Mint comes with not much preinstalled.

    • Colloidal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      No. Absolutely go with Mint. It’s sensible, stable, and familiar. Ubuntu has its weirdnesses. Mint has gone through LTS changes before. It was fine. More than fine. It’s one of the friendliest distributions around, and one I feel no reservations recommending to someone switching from Windoze.