Scanner is technically the same, it just bounces light off the object, rather than shining through it.
Hell 3D scanning is pretty cool and what I’d consider high tech, but it’s still just bouncing waves off things and recording those!
I guess there’s no escaping the universal fundamentals, or the limits of our technology at least
I’m not sure, but it could erode it when someone else decides if you’re old enough, or maybe later have no convictions, or maybe you’re a reporter the government doesn’t like, and you can’t even verify into the devices you own.
Good luck, enterprise admins! Best wishes for the future
++, long time user, it’s perfect
I don’t trust my own government, and have no reason to trust anyone else at this point, let alone for profit companies. It’s bleak.
Partly a marketing issue.
Companies keep advertising their new AI’s as destroyers of worlds, and something that’s too dangerous to even release.
As with anything else, the average user will not have but the most surface level understanding of the tool
That’s awesome, I’ll give it a spin today.
When you’re ready (now?), considering adding your project here: https://selfh.st/submit/
It’s a popular selfhoster newsletter and repository, it may give you a wider audience
Very odd, I’d have thought it’s a single system too, surely there’s a lot of shared signals, like temperature, cleaning and whatnot.
The only reason for those to be individual with another ‘parent’ system is that it would be fully modular?
I’d be interested in the actual answer/reason…
Sorry to nitpick but doesn’t 100% of it end up as heat? Vibrations, light, sounds, radio waves- all a tiny fraction of the power are also eventually absorbed by the environment.
That was my understanding at least
Engineering-wise we could manage, but no-one would be willing to spend more than anything considered ‘good enough’.
It’s like the old roman concrete question - it’s not that we’re worse at making concrete today, quite the opposite, but that we’re working with maximum cost to value ratio.
It doesn’t fix it, but as stupid as it looks, it should actually improve the chances.
If you’ve seen how the reasoning works, they basically spit out some garbage, then read it again and think whether it’s garbage enough or not.
They do try to ‘correct their errors’, so to say.
I can’t use a CRM that doesn’t have bidirectional sync with my existing carddav, or at least I’d have to setup such sync myself.
There’s https://github.com/mattogodoy/nametag, which added this feature recently I believe.
Let me guess, you are from the US
Can’t wait for us to be able to access ultra-porn by 2130
That’s fair. An unfortunate situation.
Have you read the post? Just wait for the new repo
I’ve never had outlook take long, always done in about 5 seconds. Firefox too, which would be the last to optimise for.
That would be as impossible as the UK trying to ban VPS (i.e. definitely possible, if entirely unenforceable)
Less popular, less traffic - double edged sword.
I’m not sure if you’re trying to make a point, because Galaxy is branding done well.
As a consumer, searching for samsung can return anything from a battery cell to an aircon.
Consumers can look at galaxy for a smartphones and accessories, each with their own line of distinct models.
Microsofts approach means you won’t find anything ever, because copilot ties in a buch of otherwise completely unrelated software.