sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agoIf your art trained the AI, MIT says you may never be able to prove itsan.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down16cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up198arrow-down1external-linkIf your art trained the AI, MIT says you may never be able to prove itsan.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square15linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squaremonkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 days agoHoly crap that’s wild. So someone was convicted for copying a photographer’s work? That’s really difficult to prove in the US. Artists influence each other all the time. I agree that techbros copying should be paying for the rights btw.
minus-squareRunawayFixer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·19 days agoI found an English article on it. It has the original photo and the painting, there was little point in trying to deny that it was copied :) https://hyperallergic.com/luc-tuymans-convicted-of-plagiarism-for-painting-photo-of-politician/
Holy crap that’s wild. So someone was convicted for copying a photographer’s work? That’s really difficult to prove in the US. Artists influence each other all the time.
I agree that techbros copying should be paying for the rights btw.
I found an English article on it. It has the original photo and the painting, there was little point in trying to deny that it was copied :) https://hyperallergic.com/luc-tuymans-convicted-of-plagiarism-for-painting-photo-of-politician/