Cisco and web UI are a nope all cisco enterprise exams are based on the cli with the exception of DNAC.

The ISR900 series has a max throughput of 250Mb so it will not work for your case.

Go for the opnsense on a mini pc. It will be more capable than a cisco router

If you are keen on continuing down the cisco line get GNS3 or EVE-ng setup and learn the cli with the iosv and iosv_l2 images.

Currently running virtualised opnsense on Proxmox. works pretty damn well. WebUi is great, Pergormance is awesome and it just works

How much wifi and open-source do you really want?

If you are willing to go with commercial hardware + open source firmware (OpenWRT) you might want to check the table of hardware of OpenWrt at https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_available_16128_ax-wifi and https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_available_864_ac-wifi. One solid pick for the future might be the Netgear WAX2* line or the GL.iNet GL-MT6000. One of those models is now fully supported the others are on the way. In OpenWRT forum and Wiki you may also find throughput tests of some routers.

For a full open-source hardware and software experience you need a more exotic brand like this https://www.banana-pi.org/en/bananapi-router/. The BananaPi BPi R3 and here is a very good option with a 4 core CPU, 2GB of RAM Wifi6 and two 2.5G SFP ports besides the 4 ethernet ports. There’s also an upcoming board the BPI-R4 with optional Wifi 7 and 10G SPF.

Both solutions will lead to OpenWRT when it comes to software, it is better than any commercial firmware but there might be catch about open-source wifi. The best performing wifi chips are Broadcom and those don’t usually see open-source software support. MediaTek is the open-source alternative and while they work fine they can’t, unfortunately, beat Broadcom. As most hardware is Broadcom they have hacks that go behind the published wifi standards and get it go a few megabytes/second faster and/or improve the range a bit.

While there are things like OPNsense and pfSense that may make sense in some cases you most likely don’t require that. You’ve a small network and OpenWRT will provide you with a much cleaner open-source experience and also allow for all the customization you would like. Another great advantage of OpenWRT is that with a great router like the BananaPi BPi R3 you’ve the ability to install 3rd party stuff in your router, you may even use qemu to virtualize stuff like your Pi-Hole on it or simply run docker containers.

I really like what Mikrotik offers. Their gigabit routers start at maybe €40 and have the incredibly powerful Router OS installed.

A mini-PC with pfSense would offer similar features with more processing power, but with a homelab already you don’t need to do much processing on the router itself.

I run openwrt on all my stuff. Its not Cisco but it gives absolute control over your hardware.

I got a mini pc and ran pfSense back in the day. I’ve been using pfSense ever since, though I’m now on their hardware (which costs more than your stated budget).

I agree with folks recommending Ubiquiti, but I’m also barely literate in the aspects of the market that matter. I just recognize the brand as trusted and we used their devices at a job I had.

For some reason, I have a negative view of Mikrotik - as though I’ve read something damning in a security-related article about them - but I can’t back that up. If I did, it was only once.

Stay away from TP-LINK. I had one of their devices and it was garbage.

IF it’s possible you might be able to take the ISP SFP and put it in a SFP to RJ45 media converter and then you can use any 1gig capable router. I did this with my Telus SFP.

OPNsense or OpenWRT. I run multiple OPNsense firewalls for family members all connected together with a WireGuard Mesh.

Cisco is command line for the most part until get into the APIC NSX stuff. There’s others but I’m only exposed to those 2 where I work.

Mikrotik or Ubiquiti all the way! Don’t touch Cisco.