I post the detection of a alleged Dark matter particle, because it’s so vague, 1 data point per a test. Something is there but I don’t think it’s dark matter in the way it’s explained now.
Might it just be possible that because we built everything around this one theory that we can’t get physical proof that we are missing multiple different reasons and even fields.
I feel a lot of science has bogged it’s self down with theory and maybes for decades and decades now with no proof. And with the paper printer of Universities, even old or disprove theories keep getting posted.
I am not denying the existence of some kind of matter but everything is so varied I don’t believe just dark matter exists. And Science just keeps bogging it’s self down in theories and running around in circles
Wanna see a opinion or someone disproving me.
I need to go to bed so I won’t be answering if people have some questions in couple of hours.
But what metric unit would you use instead of square degrees?
Oh, I was talking about the 25,500 full moons.
Degrees aren’t a metric unit, actually. Gradians were an attempt to make a metric unit for angles, but nobody uses those so it didn’t really work.
The people who designed and will use this telescope will be using “steredians”, which is square radians. That’s the unit which astrophysicists use for describing an area of the sky
The big problem is that circles are special. Radians make sense in some sense, but also don’t allow a rational division of the whole circle, and so many real-world applications need a rational ratio that is an integer divisor of the whole way around the circle. 360° is pretty nice for that.
The advantages of metrication just don’t apply to circles. That’s part of the reason why metric time doesn’t work, either.