• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I would say that it’s not hard to replace. I mean, all you need is an app that regularly dumps GPS data and a list of signal strengths from radios that broadcast unique IDs to start building out a database.

    What’s hard is doing one that is as complete and accurate as Google’s, because Google is hoovering up data from most cell phones about the location of a lot of devices.

    • Creesch@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      You are glossing over a lot of infrastructure and development, when boiled down to the basics you are right. So it is basically a question of getting enough users to have that app installed. Which is not impossible given that we do have initiatives like OpenStreetMap.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The crowdsourcing part is what I meant. And you probably underestimate infrastructure as well.

      This also isn’t something you can just let a few volunteers do once and forget about it. It needs to be something that people run often on their phones. Wi-Fi access points change, cell towers sometimes change. You need to keep this data up-to-date. With Google’s or Apple’s location service, when a person buys a new router, it’s probably added to the database within hours or days at worst.