0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoSupreme leader madsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1763arrow-down133
arrow-up1730arrow-down1imageSupreme leader madsh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squaredoriancodes@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoI’ve read that they are writing parts of the kernel in Rust
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoYes, I think Rust is a better C++ and will replace it in many places. Though all three will be around for ever to be honest.
minus-square0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoYes, first Rust code was released in 6.6 I think and MS also started implementing Rust code in the Windows kernel.
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoRust is certainly interesting. I think it’s the C++ we need.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoPersonally I find the syntax unreadable.
I’ve read that they are writing parts of the kernel in Rust
Yes, I think Rust is a better C++ and will replace it in many places. Though all three will be around for ever to be honest.
Yes, first Rust code was released in 6.6 I think and MS also started implementing Rust code in the Windows kernel.
Rust is certainly interesting. I think it’s the C++ we need.
Exactly my thoughts 👍.
Personally I find the syntax unreadable.