Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAnnouncing the Ladybird Browser Initiativeladybird.orgexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing the Ladybird Browser Initiativeladybird.orgDiabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoNot sure if you are trying to be funny, but if not: enlighten us?
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoC++ is a very old, extremely complex language. There are arguably objectively better modern alternatives, such as Rust.
minus-squarehexabs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI agree that Rust is the way to go, but calling something “arguably” & “objectively” in the same breath is a bit of a paradox innit?
minus-squarephlegmy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoRust is great, but anybody developing something should have the ability to choose whatever programming language they prefer. If you want it made with rust, make it yourself.
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoOf course, but it still makes sense to think carefully about the advantages of disadvantages of the tools you use when starting any project.
Not sure if you are trying to be funny, but if not: enlighten us?
C++ is a very old, extremely complex language. There are arguably objectively better modern alternatives, such as Rust.
I agree that Rust is the way to go, but calling something “arguably” & “objectively” in the same breath is a bit of a paradox innit?
Rust is great, but anybody developing something should have the ability to choose whatever programming language they prefer. If you want it made with rust, make it yourself.
Of course, but it still makes sense to think carefully about the advantages of disadvantages of the tools you use when starting any project.