• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve read the reporting, looked into the journalists and researchers behind it, and find them credible.

      If you don’t, it doesn’t affect me any.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t looked into it, just was curious and was wondering if you had anything else I can also look into later. Thanks for the original links though. I will look more into this later.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Those are both pretty through examples of indepth investigative reporting, by credentialed and experienced independent journalists and researchers. There’s plenty of threads to pull on once you start reading into it.

          It’s also been covered by Ryan Grim, former DC Beauru Chief for The Intercept. I believe he has recorded interviews up with either researchers from those articles, or some other journalists specializing in covering scientific and medical fields, I forget which.

    • explore_broaden@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, this is circumstantial evidence from people who not only believe that this ebola outbreak came from a lab, but also that COVID-19 came from a lab, both of which are widely regarded as conspiracy theories.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They aren’t conspiracy theories, at least, not according to the US Government and Biden’s DoE:

        https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/26/us/politics/china-lab-leak-coronavirus-pandemic.html

        Circumstantial evidence, not conclusive either way, but clearly the Biden administration feels the evidence is weighted slightly more on the side you just called a conspiracy theory.

        Which again, is all they allege for ebola, but unlike the co-author of that first paper I linked, I don’t have a PhD in virology, so what do I know.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t read into it yet, and am not set either way. (If anything I’d think it wasn’t true, knowing a little how the BSL4 labs run, and all the precautions in place). But I’m always down to look into credible sources. I’ll give these a skim later.