• derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Care to explain why “Valve is a terrible company” and “Steam is an awful platform”? Surely, it has tons of porn games (that you can hide), or shitty games (that is hard to sort through), or CS:GO item gambling problems (don’t really care). But I kind of fail to see how the company or the client could be fundamentally bad.

    • CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The 30% cut Steam takes is quite a bit. Considering the near-monopoly it has on game distribution, that could easily mean the difference between turning a profit and not for an indie developer.

      Personally their efforts towards things I support (PC handhelds, Linux gaming) and the convenience of the platform outweigh the things I dislike, but being frustrated by its problems is understandable when people don’t really have another choice.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I agree that 30% is a lot. But let’s look from another perspective: If a developer, for ease of calculation, sells a game for 30$ on Steam, he receives 20$. If he sells it on a competitive platform with 5% cut (that’s 6x less than Steam) he gets 27$.

        However, Steam is way bigger, and if a developer can sell the same game more times on Steam (33% more times to be exact), he breaks even.

        More people to buy = more people to play = bigger player base => more people buy it. It is a poaitive feedback loop.

        I am not arguing that 30% is good, all I am saying is I understand that Steam has to take a big cut to pay for the features it provides for “free” alongside the usual game content (cloud saves, community, workshop, utems, etc.).

      • bookmeat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think any indie developer has the means to achieve a lower cost to distribution and promotion if they try to sell and support the game themselves?

        Valve solves many problems for developers and these problems aren’t imaginary and free to resolve.

        Not saying 30% is justified for all games, but if you want a quality title it’s going to cost more than just development. Since the Unity debacle we’ve seen some developers even say openly that costs of promotion and support dwarf costs of development.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9aCwCKgkLo

      And here are some reason I personally don’t like them:

      • They routinely profit off of crime which they allow on their platforms
      • Rampant white supremacy goes completely unchallenged
      • Fuck all quality control
      • They did NFTs before it was cool
      • Will not remove hateful media off their platform unless legally forced to
      • Countless of their games have ties to real life neo-nazi movements (TF2 is especially bad for this)
      • Their CEO was active on 4chan when they started the company
      • Predatory FOMO sales tactics which has people buying games they don’t even play
      • EVERYTHING about the steam marketplace
      • This point was brought up in the video, but extreme institutional racism within the company which bleeds into their games/communities
      • Duxon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Their CEO was active on 4chan when they started the company

        This one made me giggle. Who are you, the moral internet police?

        Glory to Valve for investing in Proton.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        To sum it up: about the same as any platform where people can interact? What’s so FOMO about a game being on sale if it’s gonna be on sale next week aswell?

        I fail to see how Steam Market is so bad, it is not possible to redeem the cash (unless you do it via black market, which is against the TOS), so all money is still in the system. Yeah, it is being used to do unregulated gambling, but it’s a regulatory problem which should be handled by the countries to define what gambling is, and shut these sites down. Why the fuck should Steam care?

        NFTs in crypto space are a joke, and everywhere else they are basically in any online software, failing to see the point here.

        • bookmeat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Regarding gambling, it’s not quite so simple. Valve doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Many rich people see what goes on in that ecosystem and they lobby their governments to make it easier for themselves to do even more audacious things. Valve can lead by example instead of opening the door

      • bookmeat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you didn’t sample 4chan in that time you missed out on a lot of Internet culture. Not everyone posting on there was. It was really entertaining to watch the shitshow.