The YouTube channel “Maximum Fury” conducted a technical test of the new Cyberpunk add-on called “Phantom Liberty” on an older AMD hardware system, testing it separately on Linux and Windows 11. The Linux system, specifically the Fedora distribution called Nobara, performed significantly better, delivering 31% more frames compared to Windows 11.

The hardware used for testing included an Asrock B550 motherboard with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU and an AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT GPU from the first RDNA generation, along with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM. The CPU, RAM, and GPU were overclocked, and the system utilized undervolting to save energy costs.

When testing the game at 1080p resolution with high textures, the Linux system achieved an average of 63.72 frames per second (fps), while Windows 11 managed only 48.55 fps. This suggests that the game should run noticeably smoother on the Linux system.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    A 30% increase in performance just might get gamers to switch over to the new operating system.

    Hell that is the difference between a better graphics card for some people. It's like getting a free overclock, just for going outside your comfort zone.

      • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This is likely going to change as software support for gaming on Linux improves.

        If you consider real high performance computing, with well optimized libraries that can properly use the hardware (including GPUs), 50 % difference between windows and Linux is not really surprising. This is the reason 100% of real high performance computing is done on Linux. It is a better OS for raw performances than windows. For some tasks we are easily talking over twice the performances. It is not always the case, but not surprising at all.

        The differences clearly depend on the actual low level implementation of the code. But in general the current situation in gaming, with windows that competes with Linux on raw performances, is only due to lack of software support for gaming on Linux. As this is changing over time, we'll see games performances greatly improve in Linux. Hopefully until the physiological surpass of windows performances.

        Currently most of gaming support on Linux is done via some kind of translation layer, that has itself an overhead. It means that the real linux performance would be even better than in all these benchmarks, if it was really possible to compare 1:1 Windows and Linux with native, well optimized code.

      • dark_stang@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is probably more common than you'd think, at least in my anecdotal experience. Converting directx commands to vulkan commands, especially for AMD GPUs, can result in better and more consistent performance on Linux.

          • Lesrid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            There was a tweet before the recent Cyberpunk update that essentially said "expect very high CPU utilization as we now use the whole CPU" which I thought just meant they dropped the ball somewhere.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Usually gaming on Linux is like ~5-10% slower for GPU-bound games.

        Or faster. Depends heavily on the game. Some things wine + dxvk does better.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not rare for games to be a few % faster, as long as they’re using features that are well supported in Linux. If the bottleneck is something that needs heavier emulation because the native implementation isn’t available or good enough then yeah you’ll see slowdowns.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I kind of expect a patch for Windows that addresses the reason it is slower there now that they know there is a difference.

      • Whom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sometimes there are also unimplemented/broken features on Linux which people don't notice and save frames. Legit performance improvements over Windows do happen (especially on memory and cpu-limited systems) but I'd be skeptical of any particularly huge ones.

      • batmangrundies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah.

        I’m personally lucky that my fav titles are CPU hogs, like ARMA 3 and X4: Foundations. Both run better under Linux.

        Cyberpunk runs great too, I’m sure once we eventually get the updated drivers for NVIDIA we’ll get Ray Recon too.

    • cron@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is just one game with one particular graphics card, this might not be the same for example with nvidia cards.

      • Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nobara is great, based on fedora so very stable and fairly up to date with many built in gaming features and no after install setup required to get gaming. https://nobaraproject.org/

        Running it for over a year now on my gaming rig and very happy

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          SteamOS is perfect on the deck. Honestly it’s probably fine on a PC if all you do is game and browse Firefox. Obviously some games won’t run in Linux.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      linux users still coping

      nobody likes linux yall are chatting in an echo chamber. lemmy feels like a comp sci major college party lol

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wait, DLSS doesn't work on Linux at all? That's a pretty big thing to gloss over whenever someone is talking about linux gaming and how comparable it is to windows nowadays. I doubt I'd be able to get anything remotely close to a stable framerate on cyberpunk2077 without it, and same goes for other newer games like dying light 2 or starfield!

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        DLSS works. It took a while longer than Windows, but Nvidia themselves actually provide Wine-compatible DLL files. Also, there's a native way to implement DLSS for Linux which, I kid you not, zero games so far are using. The Windows version works fine though.

        But DLSS Frame Generation and Ray Reconstruction do not work, and there are zero workarounds.

        • Kaldo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, so he's just talking about DLSS3 features, gotchya. I thought DLSS 1 performance improvements are also frame generation but I see now thats different

          • deadcream@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            DLSS is upscaler. Game is rendered at lower resolution and then image is upscaled in a bit smarter way than simple "stretching".

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Aren’t frame generation and ray reconstruction new? I’m sure they’ll work one day, although I’m not a big Linux head I only use steamos on the deck I just see a lot of Linux posts on Lemmy so here I am lol.

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Plain DLSS definitely works, I'm guessing they mean that specific reconstruction feature. I'm sure it'll be implemented eventually if it's possible at all though.
        Side note, a kind of related feature that is missing for sure from the Linux drivers is DLDSR, and plain DSR for that matter. As a heavy user of both, it's a bit of a personal deal breaker.

      • fazo96@lemmy.trippy.pizza
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        DLSS works fine on Linux, but I don't know about frame generation and ray reconstruction specifically. It could be those two don't work yet.

    • rush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      DLSS is a matter of Nvidia’s sub-par driver support. FSR2 (and soon FSR3, which does frame gen.) works, ironically even on Nvidia GPUs :P

    • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      DLSS ray reconstruction works in Linux. You just need to launch with DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 VKD3D_CONFIG=dxr11 %command%.

        • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No, it’s definitely working. Here’s proof (open the images in a new tab and zoom in on the reflections to see the difference in clarity):

          With reconstruction:

          Without reconstruction:

          With reconstruction:

          Without reconstruction:

          With DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 and ray reconstruction enabled, reflections are much clearer and also resolve way faster during motion.

            • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Could you tell me how to use these arguments?

              Sure thing! Right click on any game in Steam and click Properties. Then in the General tab, you’ll see a Launch Options box where you can paste these arguments in.

              What most people get wrong when first trying to use it is not knowing how to correctly specify environment variables vs launch options that get passed to the game executable. If you just want to pass arguments to the game, just paste them into the box. So for example with Cyberpunk, you can just paste in

              --launcher-skip
              

              and Steam will launch the game as if you were running

              Cyberpunk2077.exe --launcher-skip
              

              However, if you want to specify environment variables as well, you’ll need the %command% placeholder. So, in order to enable raytracing and bypass the driver check for ray reconstruction in Cyberpunk, I paste these launch arguments into the settings:

              DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 VKD3D_CONFIG=dxr11 %command% --launcher-skip
              

              which is like running

              DXVK_NVAPI_DRIVER_VERSION=53799 VKD3D_CONFIG=dxr11 Cyberpunk2077.exe --launcher-skip
              

              %command% is just a placeholder for the game’s executable path.

              Hope that clears things up with regards to the launch options.

              As far as knowing which environment variables to use, that’s on a game-by-game basis, but the two most common ones that I use for Nvidia GPUs are PROTON_ENABLE_NVAPI=1 which enables DLSS in games that are not on Proton’s NVAPI whitelist, and VKD3D_CONFIG=dxr11 which enables raytracing. I almost never bother with any other environment variables unless there’s special game issues I need to workaround (like Cyberpunk’s driver version check), in which case I check ProtonDB or the game’s issue tracker on the Proton GitHub page.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also no HDR, either (not supported by the OS). You're not getting the full Cyberpunk experience without HDR and Ray Reconstruction. But I suppose that people with an older PC and monitor would benefit by switching to Linux.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I already got the full cyberpunk experience 3 years ago, and it was terrible. Making the game prettier doesn't make it any less of a joke.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I used to say things like this too, but then I played 2.0.

          Surprisingly it’s a proper game now. They turned the game into GTA in the future, and that’s a good thing. Also the perk system was completely overhauled, and weapons rebalanced so that you actually have to do more than just grab whatever has the highest DPS.

          The story’s the same, but everything else is completely different. Give it another chance.

          • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’ve tried it. It absolutely is not “GTA in the future”. It’s just as shallow as it was at launch.

  • lelgenio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Hey that's a similar setup to mine, except I have 6700XT, on ultra settings, worst case scenario I get ~60FPS, on average it's 80

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ha that hit hard. This is basically the system I just upgraded to. Well at least it’ll run the game well.

    • ______@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There isn’t a single piece of software that I use that makes me think I should upgrade my 5600. Not a single game fully utilizes it (on 1440p res)

      Older hardware is fine.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s no such thing as magic. Some computation is absolutely getting skipped.

    • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing; if the Linux version is missing useful output that would be bad, but if the DX to Vulkan translation ironed out a performance regression, or the scheduler works better in this scenario, or filesystem access had issues with NTFS it could also cause performance differences in Linux favour.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I guess I agree, but because the title felt a lot like a youtube channel clickbait promo, I bit. In an opposite way.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, that’s usually called optimization ;⁠-⁠)

      Also don’t know how much stuff runs in the background on W11, maybe there is now more stuff needing memory and CPU time

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Was meant with tongue in cheek - at least that was meant with the smiley

          But still, could very much think of some hungry background processes. I’m just guessing, as I don’t run Win11 anywhere

  • NBJack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Windows 11 is trash. Microsoft kept boasting it was “faster” than 10, but it is (unsurprisingly?) heavy in some weird areas, including a less snappy start menu, more telemetry, invasive integration with their software, you name it. Tried one machine in my collection to try it via an upgrade (a Microsoft Surface Pro 6), and the performance was so bad I ended up going back to Windows 10. Multi-second lag just to get to the program shortcuts is a really bad sign.

    • clanginator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Strange, I’ve had the opposite experience. I remember early on 11 was really bad and buggy in general so I waited to move my main install, but it’s been fantastic for me on laptop and desktop.

      Granted, I’m very particular about my Windows installs and know how to clean everything up pretty well, so I have no idea how out of box experience compares, but at least with how I use it, 11 has been fantastic, performance has been much more consistent, I don’t need to reboot as often, and it lasted way longer before I felt the need for a fresh install than any of my 10 installations.

      I still have certain things I’m not able to entirely fix that bug me (still searching for a way to remove the stupid Office 365 ad from the settings homepage) that weren’t in Windows 10, but the settings in 11 are overall SO much better, window snapping is way better, explorer is way better, HDR support is way better, multi-monitor support is better, default apps in general are better, it’s becoming easier to remove built-in apps you don’t want, and just a whole bunch of small QOL changes and updated, more consistent styling, it’s just a much nicer OS to use at this point.

      If you haven’t tried it yet, Tiny11 23H2 just came out, and while there’s still some stuff I fixed after installation, it does an excellent job of trimming most of the fat off Win11 without sacrificing usability. You can use Windows update like normal (and you’ll have to update after install) but it may be worth another try if you haven’t tried 11 recently. IMO it’s a really nice upgrade over 10 if you can fix all the little annoyances like the new right-click and such. (BloatyNosy on GitHub is what I use post-install, in addition to a few powershell commands and such)

      • NBJack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t doubt you cleaned up it up well. But you are the exception rather than the rule for experiencing Windows 11.

        The absolute shitfest that is the incessant integration with Bing and other online only tech is the biggest problem. If you have muscle memory like I do to start button + type keyword for a program + enter, it is unbearably slow to respond at times for the search to catch up. Or my new favorite, getting ready to hit enter, only to have it change the current selection right before.

        And this is to say nothing of the critical settings you can no longer directly control or are just broken. Want to change the power profile of your laptop? Buried. Want to get an estimate on your battery time remaining? Better open the registry. Want to switch your background? Well, roll the dice on that high resolution PNG you just created; unlike 10, 11 fails on some backgrounds of certain filetypes if they’re over a certain size (try a detailed PNG over 3000x4000). Just want a plain old Documents directory that isn’t integrated with OneDrive? Happy hunting; turning it off ain’t enough anymore.

    • Wrench Wizard@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Damn, you know what? I actually sort of liked windows 11 when I had it on an empty SSD but now that I’ve added all my software I’ve noticed it’s much less snappy than win10 was.

      Now I’m thinking of down(upgrading) back to windows 10 but Feel like it’s going to be a hassle. I’m not as tech savvy as I used to be and can’t even recall how to go back to win10 without just installing it fresh

  • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It is just unfortunate that it does not run on Nvidia hardware. The benchmark runs if you disable all RTX features, but it crashes on a new game before you even have full control of the character.

    Looking at protondb it looks like all people with Nvidia have issues since the 2.0 update. I hope there will be some fix soon. I don't want to replace the GPU yet it would be a waste (2080 Super).

    For now I am playing it on my Steam Deck instead.

    • visnudeva@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t know what you’re talking about, It run very well on my Nvidia GPU on Linux before and after the patch and DLC.

      • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Create a new character, select corporate start and once the other person enters the room the game crashes just for the easiest 100% reproducible crash. Other people have the same problems and even if they get past that (different game start) it still frequently crashes due to Nvidia driver bugs as far as I understand it.

        If it works so well for you what’s your setup? I heard some older Nvidia cards might work better.

        • cpw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Downgrade to the 510 Nvidia driver. Runs absolutely solid on my rtx2080. It should be noted that this crash seems to be quite correlated to the rtx20x0 cards - my speculation is that something about dlss is a bit borked on them since they’re the first dlss 2+ cards. It’s not even exclusively Linux either, reports indicate that there’s some sort of overlay (I blame the call overlay myself) that is tanking fps on windows as well. The 510 driver works great because dlss isn’t available for it as I understand it.

    • potajito@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      No issues here, more than 20 hours on Linux on a 3080 latest drivers, wayland, , dlss, ray tracing or not, works great.

      • heyoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you do ray tracing on Linux? I played today a bit and the option was grayed out. I’m on X though, using official drivers.

        • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup, you just gotta set the right environment variables. Can’t remember them off the top of my head though, “NVAPI” is part of one of them I think. Don’t have an nvidia gpu anymore, though, switched to AMD about two months back.

          • heyoni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Just came back to say it freaken worked. Cyberpunk on linux looks and runs just as well as it does on windows. I don’t think I need to dual boot anymore…

            export PROTON_HIDE_NVIDIA_GPU=0
            export PROTON_ENABLE_NVAPI=1
            export VKD3D_CONFIG="dxr,dxr11"
            export PROTON_ENABLE_NGX_UPDATER=1
            

            In case anyone else is wondering…

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    By the way, the “rendering at lower resolution and upscaling” thingy, is there a way to force AMD’s version on any game in Linux? I want to play Satisfactory and got a 5700G, fat iGPU but only 2GB VRAM.

  • Deanne@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    well, unfortunately i have the opposite but it’s not too bad. high settings with motion blur etc.,fsr disabled but with chromatic aberration on i get like 10fps less than windows gtx 1660 ti and ryzen 5 3600 prolly a nvidia issue

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Chromatic aberration is so bad, it’s trying to imitate bad lenses in a camera instead of our eyes which are so fine tuned that we don’t really have it(unless you need glasses lenses)

          • arin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Not true, when i have glasses on i see the chromatic aberration, but not when i take them off. The game exaggerates CR like old cameras where newer high quality lenses on cameras don’t have such bad CR mimicked by the game.

            • Janne Moren@fosstodon.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              @arin You see the chromatic aberration from your glasses. You don’t see the aberration from your eyes, same as you don’t see the blind spot or the yellow spot, or notice that your peripheral vision is in black and white only.

      • Deanne@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        i should’ve rephrased that,normally the high preset disables chromatic aberration, i enable it and i use the same settings on both operating systems

  • Mindlight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s a well known fact that every second major release of Windows is crap.

    • Windows 95 was not the best.
    • Windows 95OSR2 was the one you wanted.
    • Windows 98 sucked.
    • Windows 98 2nd ed. worked as the former should have.
    • Windows 2000 was great but had no support for running games.
    • XP solved that and made people leave Windows 98 (I deliberately left out the clusterf… Windows ME.).
    • Windows Vista sucked balls.
    • Windows 7 was what Vista should have been.
    • Windows 8? Metro on phones, yes! On desktop? No no no.
    • Windows 10 got Microsoft back on track again.

    I thought the new upgrade scheme (2 editions per year) Microsoft introduced with Windows 10 would be like “every second release will suck” but it started to look like Microsoft were able to break the curse…

    …and then Windows 11 happened.

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I ran 2000 back in the day and didn’t really have any problems with it. IMO it breaks the pattern somewhat. XP was better, of course, but 2000 was a good OS.