Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The idea that NPPs are some unsafe technology just waiting to explode is dramatic and untrue.

    You’re the first person to mention exploding here. GP was saying that they make for a good target in war time to turn into a dirty bomb, either intentionally or not.

    …but the idea that there’s no safe amount of radiation is ridiculous (we don’t know, but presumably it’s okay in some amounts since you’re getting radiation doses every day even not living near anything nuclear).

    “We don’t know”??? Sorry, but we do know.

    There’s no 100% safe level because any level carries some risk. Higher levels means higher risk.

    Background radiation has some risk, but it’s a risk we accept. X-rays, plane flights, etc all have increased risk (hence people exposed to lots of x-rays wearing leads) but we accept them. Material from decommissioned nuclear plants is way higher on this scale.

    Nuclear power has downsides as well as positives. Depending on your perspective (e.g. do you work cleaning up the aftermath, or just benefitting from the energy) one will outweigh the other.

    • relic_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Okay I didn’t understand OPs point I suppose. Worth nothing that they are designed to withstand airplane hits.

      There’s no 100% safe level because any level carries some risk.

      Actually we don’t know that and there’s no valid empirical evidence to support that claim. We only have data at moderate to high levels. There’s a big gap between walked passed a container of level waste and got impacted by a nuclear destination.