• TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wouldn’t recommend vanilla Arch only because of the installation process. CachyOS that simplifies it is an extremely good pick for a person who already knows what a computer is, but wants to try a proper OS.

    Arch mostly got it’s reputation in the early days. Today some things are a lot easier to do on Arch than on other distros, especially because AUR exists. Also, it built one of the best wikis over all that time.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Of the last 20 or so people iv helped swap over to Linux in the last year. They have all ended up just going straight to either endeavour or cachy.

      The Ubuntu family distro like mint or pop always have some kinda of weird hardware problem with something. Everytime with out fail. Seriously I love the Ubuntu descendants like pop and mint. When they work, they just fucking work and are rock solid. But their it just works scope is just too damn narrow compared to arch for the freaks I know.

      It’s amazing how much weird ass hardware people use that with out something as large as the aur, you just aren’t finding a reasonable solution. Fixes exist but ones that a total idiot can just install are rare. And fedora isnt much better in that regard.

      Fedora also just has… Problems ane a community that makes it hard to tell new users to Google solutions

      That or the “app stores” confuse the new users or cause problems inside of two weeks. Im always baffled Everytime I get a call and someone has managed to break their computer via a GUI package manager or app store.

      Cachy just has everything games want pre installed and even the most nontechie gamers iv known basically hit the ground running with it. I think part of that is because it works for the exact use case a gamer would want basically out of the box with as little fiddling as needed and arch is bleeding edge enough to actually run new games reliably enough people don’t fuck with shit and break it trying to make things work.

      For the rest endeavour has had the best rate at actually keeping people from just going back to windows.

      Seriously wild how good endeavours conversion rate is.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The devs of the OS spell it Endeavour. It’s one of those words that’s spelled slightly different in various parts of the English-speaking sphere. As it functions as a name here, I have no problem spelling it their way when referring to the OS.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Weird way to spell EndeavorOS

        With the missing ‘U’? I know, right? But it’s not weird; it’s just American, so it rewrites its history.

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      For most people though yeah, Debian is rock solid, only went arch on my desktop for nvidia drivers (and HDR), archinstall really simplifies installing it.

      Arch and Debian wikis are both amazing sources of information, highly recommend for any distro.