• taco@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, both things can be true?

    I don’t think that’s true. They could both be aims, but one would be secondary (or at least not primary).

    I don’t think they’re both true at all though. I don’t believe for a second the risk posed by/to users invested enough to root their phones is high enough to warrant this nonsense. The cynical/profitable explanation seems a whole lot more likely, imo.