Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMatrix.org is Introducing Premium Accountsmatrix.orgexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down17
arrow-up1157arrow-down1external-linkMatrix.org is Introducing Premium Accountsmatrix.orgPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareLWD@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down21·1 day ago The alternative is to turn off the server, which we want to avoid doing. The funnier and IMO better option
minus-squarestm@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·23 hours agoand the entire protcol with it, they just have better marketing than xmpp, and from what i read are even worse protocol.
minus-squarececilkorik@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·20 hours agoxmpp is still the best, nobody’s ever going to change my mind. jabber 4 lyfe!
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·18 hours agoSpoken like someone who didn’t work with the xmpp protocol
minus-squaremelroy@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6·24 hours agoHehe. Then all those busy rooms will be ded. This would be a huge problem for matrix. Not really technically (since you could add additional rooms from other servers), but more like brand damage.
The funnier and IMO better option
and the entire protcol with it, they just have better marketing than xmpp, and from what i read are even worse protocol.
xmpp is still the best, nobody’s ever going to change my mind. jabber 4 lyfe!
Spoken like someone who didn’t work with the xmpp protocol
Hehe. Then all those busy rooms will be ded. This would be a huge problem for matrix. Not really technically (since you could add additional rooms from other servers), but more like brand damage.