The population (especially the younger generation, who never seen a different kind of technology at all) is being conditioned by the tech industry to accept that software should behave like an unreliable, manipulative human rather than a precise, predictable machine. They’re learning that you can’t simply tell a computer “I’m not interested” and expect it to respect that choice. Instead, you must engage in a perpetual dance of “not now, please” - only to face the same prompts again and again.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    24 hours ago

    What’s great about YouTube and other corporate social media is that you can never use it.

    I highly recommend that.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Nicht wahr. I failed my first Discrete Math exam trying to teach myself using only the provided resources (professor, text book, notes, etc). The only reason I passed with a C was because I was able to watch lectures from better professors on YouTube.

      I have also used YouTube to fix my car and many other things. Old Reddit (corporate social media) was a very valuable resource of knowledge.

      Every single human accomplishment of note was only made possible through social bonds and social collaboration. We need each other. We need tight knit communities, but since so much of the soul of our race has been eroded by capitalist zombie consumerism and the atomization of individuals through car dependent urban sprawl, we are sometimes forced to rely on social media to meet that need.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You could have used ad blockers. You could have done any number of things. You were not forced to use YouTube as it is. But I understand … It is hard to recognize that we actively consume media. It is hard to think from perspective.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        That’s the second time now I’ve seen this term atomization referring to people.

        Are people being turned into atoms now?

        EDIT I mean we’re already atoms. But like into a single atom maybe?

        • Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          “Nuclear Family” TLDR Early USA zoning policies deliberately encouraged segregation and car dependency and promoted a family household consisting of a Mother, Father and 2.1 children, following industrial era ideas, which are relatively new and rather stupid. Pushed to the logical limit, this led to people getting pushed into housing that is deliberately far apart resulting in increased loneliness (gender free fuckery), and weaker communities, hence “atomization”.

          Is it fixable? Yeah. This was covered in Environmental Sciences 15+ years ago and most cities are realizing that pedestrianized areas are wayyyy more profitable than asphalt. People complain, but the world keeps going.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That’s what I figured, from context. Was the word “isolation” somehow insufficient? We had to start using this even more vague term?

            • StripedMonkey@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Isolation has the connotation of a single thing or individual being… Isolated from the group. Atomization is meant to evoke a sense of the more widespread impact on society. After all, if something only impacts a small subset it’s considered… “Isolated”

              That being said, atomization is definitely not a new term to describe this…

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Fine, but don’t log in. Stop allowing full unfettered access to every bit of data that comprises your daily existence. That’s obviously my point.

        • Kissaki@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Stop allowing full unfettered access

          There’s a decline button. At least privacy settings don’t repeatedly come up again (what this post is about).

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            So long as you’re not using an app or a standard browser, sure. Everyone’s running Tails?

            • Nyonnyan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              What? The decline button adds a cookie that tells a given website that you’ve declined any given popup, so that the website knows not go give you this popup again. This means that if you are using a standard web browser (defined as generic firefox/chromium without adblock) said cookie remains for some time until it expires; because yes, keeping any cookie for undetermined amount of time is bad. So if anything your tails gets more popups if they dont store said cookies and use no external tools to block those popups like adblockers. Also yes I know tails is an OS, but I dont get why using it matters in the discussion about cookie popups not storing their declination state for rolls dice 4 years.