• NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Snap has the ability to do the base system in a much more modular way and could be really cool for an immutable system. Forcing them on desktop users with their transitional deb packages and making it heavily integrated with only one repository really screwed it up.

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also I’m not sure about slow startup times. Are those still an issue? If so, then I would be sure to considet Ubuntu dead and not only not recommend it but actively recommend switching away from it.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, they are still an issue. It is irritating enough that I have currently zero snaps and would rather build from source if snap is the only binary option.

        • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s basically THE dealbreaker for snaps. Loop devices on lsblk? Most people don’t care and wouldn’t see it. Proprietary backend? Again, most regular people (Ubuntu’s target audience) do not care. So the slow startup time is THE dealbreaker.