• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Across the board, in product survey after product survey, consumers agree with you every time about thin phones. At best nobody cares beyond being briefly conceptually impressed (in a way that doesn’t translate into sales), at worst people actively hate how fragile it looks (or actually is). They always would rather have more battery life than a thinner phone, and actually below a certain weight most consumers prefer a phone to be heavier.

    So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?

    I honestly have no idea. This isn’t one of those things where I pose a rhetorical question and then answer it. The planned obsolescence of the battery seems plausible, but a thinner battery doesn’t really correspond to a shorter lifespan, just a shorter duty cycle. Maybe it’s just a vanity thing, like a competition between companies, but the bean-counters don’t usually let that sort of thing keep going if it doesn’t sell. Maybe it’s marketing, but that never really succeeds either. I really don’t know.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?

      Because Steve Jobs’ ghost still haunts and demands all designs to be as anti consumer as possible

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        Anti-consumer for the sake of the bottom line is to be expected, but they’re burning millions of dollars on this.