• meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yes.

      Would one question the relevance of a biography that mentioned that an accomplished straight male scientist was a ‘family man’ or that a scientist was also a married woman with children?

      Questioning the validity of mentioning that a scientist is queer is identical to the attitude that queer people are fine as long as they are invisible.

      It was a biography, biographies mention biographical details. Yet when that detail is ‘queer’, people feel empowered to complain it was even mentioned.

      I’m not on the defensive here. I intend to come across as offensive. You tell US exactly why mentioning that a person is queer is not relevant in a biographical sketch.

      • individual@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        OK so where is the representation of people with arthritis, Zoroastrians, & people from Bangladesh?

        • meyotch@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ok, you are a sealion, cool, good to know.

          Did you know you can mention multiple facts about a person in a biography and they are all valid and mentionable?

            • meyotch@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I know that my engagement in this exercise will not change their opinion. I am engaged because this shit is exhausting and it is exactly the thing to challenge at this moment.

              I think it’s time to start wearing these, before they become mandatory again.

              pink triangles