• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You just start taxing them.

    If they leave then seize their properties and redistribute them, then real workers can utilize those assets and wealth.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’m all for chasing them away.

    If taxation is what they won’t accept, They always saw your nation as something to be exploited and sucked dry, which means they were never on your society’s side, which with such resources makes them incalculably dangerous.

    If they fail the taxation test, the nation should be relieved when they run away.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah but when we chase them away, let’s make sure their fortune stays here so that the government can use it for gooe purposes like cycling infrastructure

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I wish we could get such policies. At the very least there should be codes that wealthy people that leave to avoid taxes will be barred from doing any business in the US, which should extend to global partners that choose to do business with them if they then wish to expand to the US, nope you partnered with asshole McGee after they ran away so fuck off. It could be done, it would just require the agents and resources to do so.

        But just as our elected officials won’t vote against their own interests, they will defend the interests of the robber barons that pay their real salary in bribes, which is effectively legal post citizens united, so nothing can change under the current system, a new one would need to be made in its place.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Just like gun laws, this cannot possibly work in the US. Won’t try it, won’t condone it, won’t consider the evidence. Will cover ears and sing loudly whilst looking away.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is good shit:

    Ortega is poised to receive a record dividend of €3.1bn (£2.7bn) this year from his shares in Zara’s parent group, Inditex. He is reportedly racing to spend the windfall, which would otherwise be subject to wealth taxes. Sources close to Pontegadea told the Guardian it was not investing to avoid tax, but following its mandate “to create wealth from the original assets, maintain it, make it grow, and consolidate it over generations”.

    What is clear is that, two years on, a predicted exodus of the rich, trumpeted in endless alarmist headlines, has not materialised. Forbes counted 26 Spanish billionaires in 2021. This year, it lists 34, with a combined net worth comfortably over $200bn.

    So far, there is no sign that it has affected growth. Spain was the world’s fastest-expanding major advanced economy last year, outpacing even the US, with GDP up 3.2%. By contrast, growth in the UK and France last year barely scraped above 1%. On the balconies of the Planeta building, and in the country at large, the green shoots are alive and well.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      I mean, I’m not really understanding how this is a win “for the people”. As per the article, the tax itself is quite small, and there is a loophole allowing them to not be taxed on real estate investments. So they are just shifting their wealth to real estate.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh NO! We DEFINITELY do NOT want to Scare Away the people who are NOT paying Taxes!

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone who thinks that “chasing away billionaires” is even a thing that can happen needs to read The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight by Cristobal Young, by far the most extensive actual study on the subject.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      It makes sense intuitively. By the time you become a billionaire, you can live wherever you want and have any kind of lifestyle you desire. Billionaires living in Spain live in Spain because they want to live in Spain. And all wealth past a certain point is meaningless, just a number for bragging rights. Whether someone has $10 billion or $7 billion makes zero difference in their actual lifestyle or quality of life. If you’re already in a country you’re happy with, why leave for a tax that has absolutely no impact on your quality of life?

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is exactly what Young’s research shows; generally, when the wealthy move, they move to places with good quality of life. Tax brackets don’t really factor into it. Often raising taxes on the wealthy actually increases the attractiveness of a region because the wealthy want to live in places with low crime rates, good infrastructure, that sort of thing. And a well funded government has more capacity to create those things.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 day ago

        That will be in large part because of the changes to the non-dom tax rules, where (broadly speaking) you could live in the UK, but opt out of the UK’s tax system and pay tax somewhere else where there wasn’t any tax. The people who left will largely be people who weren’t paying a meaningful amount of tax anyway.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Bingo. They’re not actually losing tax paying millionaires. This is entirely a benefit to the UK.

          Also, let’s put that number in perspective. There are over three million millionaires in the UK.

          That’s why you never, ever see news articles about tax changes supposedly driving away millionaires use percentages. Because if they did the headline would be that in two years the number of millionaires in the UK has shrunk by half a percent.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It definitely can happen. But at that point the best response is to lock down borders to prevent anyone from leaving the country.

          • lunarul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            I lived in a country where that happened. The king gave land to peasants in return for serving in WW2 (which lead to desperate peasants who didn’t know how to use their rifles as more than clubs scaring the Germans away with their savagery). My wife’s great-great-grandfather (or maybe one more great-) got so much land that when the communists came and started arresting people for having too much wealth he split his land among his 6 sons, but they still ended up with too much and all 6 went to jail.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah yes, the USSR model. If our policies don’t work, violate human rights until no one points out they don’t work.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This is an interesting idea. Not as much about billionaires, but about how regions race to the bottom to attract investment. Just like major sports franchises get insanely good tax treatment by moving or threatening to move theier team. Each city tries to give the better deal.

            The idea that if the local gov doesn’t collect, the federal will should mostly put an end to that kind of thing. Ensuring that local governments get the funding they need.

            Something like this, but just for business tax would be absolutely huge for US cities. It would also mean teams would go where the fans are, and businesses would go where the employees are.

          • WallsToTheBalls@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Being a millionaire is a drastically different situation than a billonaire. Anyone can reasonably save a million dollars over their life, or have that much in retirement accounts.

            It’s when you have billions in solid assets you start to developed unregulated power

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Remember that when you say that some group doesn’t have human rights you have willfully chosen to put yourself in the group of people that includes the worst of humanity.

            • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              That sounds like a full on liberal take.

              The truth is some simply are parasites and not human. All they deserve is a relatively painless and quick death. Millionaires are among those just like landlords, politicians and journalists.