• outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    One of the major contributors to early versions. Then they did the math and figured out it was a dead end. Yes.

    Also one of the other contributors (weizenbaum i think?) pointed out that not only was it stupid, it was dabgeroys and made people deranged fanatical devotees impervious to reason, who would discard their entire intellect and education to cult about this shit, in a madness no logic could breach. And that’s just from eliza.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        ~1948-52, yeah

        Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing.