“OnePlus has announced a new system that limits who can unlock the bootloader on their phones. Stating reasons such as “data security” and an enhanced “system stability” […]. OnePlus has introduced a new procedure where anyone wanting to unlock the bootloader on their devices must first fill out an online request form for “Deep Testing””.

Even if it is for one region, it is still enshitification preventing phones to have custom ROM 🤦‍♂️

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is Daddy Google making them do this under the excuse of “data security”? It’s a bit sus that they’ve all “decided” to do it of their own volition.

    Plus Google has locked a bunch of stuff out of the open source versions now, so it’s likely only a matter of time before it’s effectively useless.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    FFS. Who the hell is even left that allows unrestricted bootloader unlocks? Sony?

    E: oh, Pixels too I guess

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I just stopped buying Android devices. Now I inherit old ones that other people would have thrown out. They are ok if you didn’t pay for it.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I don’t know much about hacking, but it’s surprising to me that there’s not a way to get around this. What stops people from developing a forced workaround? What would need to be done to develop one?

    Edit: Answering my own question, sort of, it seems that a locked bootloader uses cryptographic keys stored on the device, so the problem becomes a typical key brute forcing scenario. What a mess. It’s so annoying that there aren’t more “touchscreen handheld computers” where you can just install whatever you want on them the same as building your own PC. I hate how everything like that is being chipped away over time.

    Stuff like this seems promising though in a very far-out, push-comes-to-shove kind of way: https://www.synacktiv.com/en/publications/how-to-voltage-fault-injection#protect

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There’s also the fact that if you did crack the encryption, they would pull a Nintendo and sue you for it. Modifying your own devices is still not technically legal in most of the US, and I imagine corporate money keeps it that way in much of the rest of the world as well.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Xiaomi recently blocked bootloader unlocking and even before that it was a convolute process were you made a request using a app of theirs and had to wait one week before the phone was unlocked.

  • DoctorPress@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    We should use the term “licensing” a phone over “buying”. Because this shit ain’t buying if I am, the device owner, can’t do shit they want to their phone cuz random big companies needs to protect the apps (aka spyware) from users.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As someone who just tried daily driving a non-unlocked phone for the first time in 10+ years, I’m interested in seeing some development in the direction of sandboxing. Not sure how stuff works in GrapheneOS for example (haven’t tried it) and haven’t delved into too much details of AOSP either, but I think it makes sense - make sure that system and sensitive apps are not possible to tamper with even if you want to, and run everything else in a separate space that you can have root access to. Would be nice, although realistically I don’t see this happening outside of some developer-focused device.

    But yeah, even if I don’t want to unlock, I’d prefer having the peace of mind that I can if I decide to. Haven’t tried OnePlus so far, and this here makes is much less likely that I would in the future.

  • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago
    • “requirements are only applicable to users in China”
    • “restrictions will not apply to previous versions of ColorOS” (<16)
    • “unlocking the bootloader won’t void the phone’s warranty”

    While not ideal, it’s also not the end of the world.

    • vividspecter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hopefully this is as far as it goes and not something they will continually restrict each year. This feels similar to the Xiaomi situation which seems to have had the same problems in China, and they have gradually restricted unlocking more and more.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fucking fantastic. /s. This is probably the first step to killing bootloader unlocking entirely and that could be a real problem because to the best of my knowledge that would leave Google and maybe Fairphone as the only two possibilities in existence until Graphene launches a device

      • ElectroLisa@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Motorola does conditional bootloader unlocks, you need to have your device connected to the internet for roughly 7 days after you bought it, in order to have the “OEM unlocking” option available. Then you have to request a bootloader unlock key through their website which requires a Lenovo ID account.

        I’m not saying it’s impossible, but at any of those steps they can make shit worse (like Xiaomi did).

        To my knowledge the only brand which lets you unlock your bootloader without a fuss is Nothing. Sony and Fairphone are on close second but there you still need to request a bootloader unlock key.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh yeah, I forgot about them. Question is, how well does custom ROMs work with media tech chips? Because from what I understand, a lot of Motorola’s are now using media tech. And I have not seen many custom ROMs work with them.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Google don’t restrict unlocking the boot loader. I just checked on my Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the OEM unlocking toggle is still there. The only barrier is enabling developer options by repeatedly tapping the build number in settings/about phone, just like it always has been

          You can only relock the bootloader with a signed OS image loaded

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had the 5 but really everything after 1 was aafter they had become just as bullshit as the competition

    • magikmw@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I switched to Nord after running my 3T down and I’m really happy, I got a great upgrade in hardware AND no shitty curved screen for 1/3rd of the price.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I kinda want a phone in the exact shape of the oneplus one but with current wifi and recent ish processor. When I got the 5 I gave the 1 to my brother who proceeded to drop it at work and run over it with a forklift. The screen cracked and the wood back plate broke but the phone still worked. Some months later he got the 5t and ran over that too but it was decimated.