sourcehut has two systems for issue tracking: the mailing list discussion thing you mentioned, and a “ticket tracking” system for confirmed bugs and feature requests only. see e.g. https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
@HelloRoot@lemy.lol mentioned the email workflow, and it’s great. In addition:
it’s a pay-for service, but it’s cheap, given that you get:
unlimited repos, public or private
a nice build CI system
mailing lists and an email interface to manage & interact with them
ticket trackers
a well-thought-out project home page system: you add as many repositories, ticket trackers, and making lists to the project, and pick a README for it. It’s quite nice.
the web interface is extremely lightweight: little or no JS - it plays nicely with keyboard-driven browsers, TUI browsers, and even curl
did I mention the excellent build CI?
it supports both git and Mercurial repositories
It’s also open source and self-hostable if you’d rather.
It’s a fantastic service, and well with the tiny hosting price.
I’ve also heard of this: https://sourcehut.org/
Personally I like it because I tend to not use the github/lab web ui features.
But one thing that really never clicked with me is the email based issues workflow. I’d prefer to open issues like on github.
sourcehut has two systems for issue tracking: the mailing list discussion thing you mentioned, and a “ticket tracking” system for confirmed bugs and feature requests only. see e.g. https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
@HelloRoot@lemy.lol mentioned the email workflow, and it’s great. In addition:
it’s a pay-for service, but it’s cheap, given that you get:
the web interface is extremely lightweight: little or no JS - it plays nicely with keyboard-driven browsers, TUI browsers, and even curl
did I mention the excellent build CI?
it supports both git and Mercurial repositories
It’s also open source and self-hostable if you’d rather.
It’s a fantastic service, and well with the tiny hosting price.
what happened to the thorns