• TheBigRoomXXL@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Bitbucket lol .I would rather not.

    I used to love gitlab (great CI!) but the quality is really going down. Everything is slow and there UI is full of bugs (god I hate there virtual srolll in epics).

    There is also sourcehut. They have the best CI for me but sadly issue / merge request management is mail based.

    Gitea looks like it is going the gitlab way with enterprise support and cloud because they need to make money.

    Forgejo is cool (how do you prononce it?) but I am really sad they based there CI on github action.

    • doktormerlin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bitbucket makes total sense for companies thanks to the Jira integration and wide range of integrations with the CI pipelines.

      As a private person, why would you ever use an Atlassian product?

      • Kissaki@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 minutes ago

        There’s a threshold where good integration does not trump shit product. Bitbucket sucks. I’m glad we’re not using it even when we’re still stuck with shit Jira and confluence.

        • doktormerlin@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          Whats the reason for it to suck in your opinions?

          I think it works pretty good. Pull-Requests are easy to follow, you can even suggest minor code changes directly in your comments or create Jira tickets for follow-up tasks. Commit history is nicely readable. CI works very robust and has lots of possibilities. Project level permissions and branch settings are easy to create. I have nothing to complain really