• CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They don’t require AI neural networks.

    Sharpening and denoising don’t. But upscalers worth anything do require neural nets.

    Anything that uses a neural network is the definition of AI.

    • ccunix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not true

      Company I used to work for had excellent upscalers running on FPGAs that they developed 20+ years ago.

      The algorithms have been there for years, just AI gives it bit of marketing sprinkle to something that has been a solved problem for years.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well, the algorithms that make up many neural networks have existed for over 60 years. It’s only recently that hardware has been able to make it happen.

        AI gives it bit of marketing sprinkle to something that has been a solved problem for years.

        Not true and I did say “any upscaler that’s worth anything”. Upscaling tech has existed at least since digital video was a thing. Pixel interpolation is the simplest and computationally easiest method. But it tends to give a slight hazy appearance.

        It’s actually far from a solved problem. There’s a constant trade-off beyond processing power and quality. And quality can still be improved by a lot.