• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              The government holding ownership stakes in companies. If so, have you been in favor for a long time or did it start this week? Because I’m focusing on the people that just recently adopted this position after years of opposition to anything that even smelled like government interfering with business.

              • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I never took a stance on it.

                Examples of federal Crown corporations include: the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Canada Post

                These are fine, fairly high quality in terms of service. And I guess in general these two having revenue streams and self funding mean that I don’t pay taxes to run a national broadcaster and our postal service.

                I would rather not have junk mail or advertisements in our public broadcasts. I would have to look at numbers to say whether the taxes are a worthwhile trade-off.

                I do not want news or mail to only have corporate owned options, because then capitalist interests would have a much heavier influence on communications is Canada. I wish we had a national crown ISP, for the same reason.

                In Canada, state-owned corporations are referred to as Crown corporations, indicating that an organization is established by law, owned by the sovereign (either in right of Canada or a province), and overseen by parliament and cabinet.

                • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Then you aren’t my target audience. Canadians are very different from USA Republicans who have a long and loud history on this topic and then flipped in one day to say it’s okay to have a little communism as a treat.

                  • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    Well yeah sure, it’s just a little histrionic to call all government owned businesses communism. They aren’t enforcing a monopoly on chip fab or anything.

                    Trump tries to ban AMD then sure, it’s communism and would be super weird.

      • xep@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        If the government owns every company, maybe you have communism, but most likely what you have is autocracy. If the government owns a 10% stake of one company, that’s some nationalisation. There are good reasons for it in capitalism, such as for regulating natural monopolies. I’m not sure Intel falls into "good reasons,’ since it appears to me to be some kind of corruption.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          10% for now. Trump always changes his mind. One company for now. Except the 15% tax that exists only on Nvidia. 15% for now. Trump always changes his mind.

          Broken record: if Biden or Obama did this the same MAGA people making excuses would be decrying this government overreach. And what happens when Trump isn’t in office anymore? When a Dem embraces and extends this governor power grab?