Six years ago the entire Linux enthusiast space was super excited for the PinePhone, then everything fell apart. What went wrong? Was PINE64’s favoritism towards Manjaro the sole issue or were there other problems?

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have both the PinePhone and the PinePhone Pro, IMHO :

    • lack of Android apps (yes, I know, weird to open with that but for a lot of people, that’s the 1 thing, not actual calls or SMS) despite Waydroid because it didn’t exist initially then requires higher specs
    • bad power management : the battery is small so without spot on power management one ends up with less than a day of normal usage, that’s a show stopper for most
    • lack of updates : the PinePhone Pro was available without camera support, no big deal, most were expecting based on the initial pace of updates that it would eventually come but even today checking https://wiki.pine64.org/wiki/PinePhone_Pro it’s either Not implemented or Not working

    … so with all that very very few people used either as a daily driver and thus even less probably invested time to make it actually usable.

    It’s amazing as a tinkering device with connectivity… but in practice I went instead to a deGoogle Android phone (with /e/OS by Murena). I still have other hardware by Pine, e.g. PineNote or PineTab2, so I do enjoy they provide a very valuable service to the community and I’ll keep on, probably, getting more from them but one has to be pragmatic about the software limitations coming from a company that basically does not provide software for the hardware they sell.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Right or https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/09/valve-appear-to-be-testing-arm64-and-android-support-for-steam-on-linux/ is also pretty positive but until it’s actually done and does support banking apps (which might not be possible due to a lot of restrictions, e.g Google services, signed ROM only, etc) then everybody will remain on the fence.

        Good to know for the PPPro. PmOS indicates the support as partial https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/PINE64_PinePhone_Pro_(pine64-pinephonepro) I should try again at some point.

        • 1peter10@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Just 2ct’s on the banking thing (sorry if it sounds rude, but I just can’t hear it anymore):

          Just forget banking apps of you don’t want to stay on iOS or proper Google Android forever and ever and ever, even AOSP-based OSes struggle with that (a lot).

          Go to a bank that still has a proper website and allows some kind of hardware device for TAN (and tell them that this is why you are leaving/joining) - we need to show market demand for alternative solutions or else these will disappear completely over time.

          We also need to make regulators/politicians understand, that taking part in life must be possible without owning a device blessed by Google or Apple. We really need laws here.

          • utopiah@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not rude but it’s incorrect. I have a deGoogled phone and do mobile banking with it. I don’t know for how long though but just to say it’s possible today.

            Yes though I do recommend relying on a bank that does not force its customers to use Apple or Google only. I hope they’d be a way to disclose that beside just name & shame.