Or should I go 11 > 12 > 13?


Edit: Thanks for all the replies. I asked this out of laziness and apparently trying this is not a lazy thing to do. I’m not Bilbo Baggins seeking an adventure. Will go with 11 > 12 > 13 way, though might stay at 12 for a while at this point. You know, lazy. :)

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Major version changes for any software from the OS right down to a simple notepad app should update as sequentially as possible (11>12>13>etc). Skipping over versions is just asking for trouble, as it’s rarely tested throughly.

    It might work, but why risk it.

    An example: if 12 makes a big database change but you skip over that version, 13 may not recognize the databases left by 11 because 12 had the code to recognize and reformat the old database while that code was seen as unnecessary and removed from 13.

    Stuff like this is also why you can’t always revert to an older version while keeping the data/databases from the newer software.

    • muhyb@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, that makes sense. Major changes in software are no joke. If it wasn’t my actual server I could’ve tried it though, could be a fun thing to pass time.