The pattern are “we have this. we did this, now we believe this that is wrong” and
“says what it is not, says what it is instead”
Sometimes a combination of the two
On premise there is nothing wrong with such sentences but llms tend to heavily overuse it and it becomes very formulatic.
Ask an llm to explain any concept and you are bound to find examples of it. Tell it how it made a logical error and your almost guaranteed to see an example of it.
Over the entire text i note about 10 variations of that pattern.
The pattern are “we have this. we did this, now we believe this that is wrong” and “says what it is not, says what it is instead”
Sometimes a combination of the two
On premise there is nothing wrong with such sentences but llms tend to heavily overuse it and it becomes very formulatic.
Ask an llm to explain any concept and you are bound to find examples of it. Tell it how it made a logical error and your almost guaranteed to see an example of it.
Over the entire text i note about 10 variations of that pattern.