• Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it is possible to establish a society that is not militaristic. It must always be prepared to combat fascism and capitalism; but it must also have freedom of speech.

    An anarchocommunist society must prevail through the full liberation of all people; it must mean that basic needs are taken care of, and that all can discuss freely without hatred, without fear of state repression. It must mean that corruption and oligarchism is nonexistent.

    I do not believe in a society where everyone lives in fear; I believe in a society where everyone lives in joy for the next day.

    • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are stupid. Look at the United States. The only way to rule these people is through fear.

    • Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately when people criticize socialist countries for the lack of “free speech,” even if with good intentions, they are usually parroting the talking points of Western, bourgeois media and only serves as to justify imperialist intervention against them.

      These criticisms however derive from an ignorance of the way politics work in such countries whose only perception comes from behind the iron curtain and only through the lens of fascist and capitalist media.

      In historically socialist countries, democracy had always been principally practiced on the local and communal stages, where individuals had the most capacity to take decisions regarding their daily lives and the situation of their neighbourhood, locality or commune. I highly recommend reading on this topic:

      Local Communities, a Yugoslav Take on Direct Democracy.

      Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan.