as I get older I get more towards freedom of association vs forced inclusion. I am even somewhat (not completely) against forcing companies to hire people they dot want to hire.
if that company want to lose money because they don’t hire men( or women or muslim or whatever), in my opinion that’s their right.
and companies hire based on their need mostly.
two points against my own argument:
1- companies should hire based on what they want but should not be able to fire you willy nilly.
even if you are a piece of shit that support retarded or racist ideology.
2-copanies being able to hire who they want (one legged female presenting dem-gus/god) is for a better society that people are not as poor as the current culture created by greed and power. so I don’t think it should be done now.
but charity or gyms or clubs and so on should be able to include or exclude who they want.
it may sound unfair to you but for me it goes with freedom of association which is way more important than freedom of speech.
as I get older I get more towards freedom of association vs forced inclusion. I am even somewhat (not completely) against forcing companies to hire people they dot want to hire. if that company want to lose money because they don’t hire men( or women or muslim or whatever), in my opinion that’s their right. and companies hire based on their need mostly.
two points against my own argument: 1- companies should hire based on what they want but should not be able to fire you willy nilly. even if you are a piece of shit that support retarded or racist ideology.
2-copanies being able to hire who they want (one legged female presenting dem-gus/god) is for a better society that people are not as poor as the current culture created by greed and power. so I don’t think it should be done now.
but charity or gyms or clubs and so on should be able to include or exclude who they want.
it may sound unfair to you but for me it goes with freedom of association which is way more important than freedom of speech.