• hayvan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Indeed. I’m not against copyrights owned by individuals. Corporations owning rights is downright dystopian.

    • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So, we can use Donald Duck, but not Harry Potter? I don’t quite understand why. Why shouldn’t I be allowed to write my own Harry Potter books? (not that I would).

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m not even sure that IP being owned by non-natural persons is the problem, for example I could see a coop collectively owning copyrights/patents relevant to their work. The problem is the frankly ridiculous amount of time granted for copyrights and obvious methods being patented.

      Change both of those and you keep the benefit of innovative individuals/small groups having legal protection from large corporations muscling in and stealing their work and get rid of most of the damage done by the current system.