AI research is very complex and includes several fields, like AI programming experts, linguistic experts, neuro scientists and philosophy. These people are highly specialized in their field, and it is a field of scientific study. Scientific AI research today is a combination of several scientific fields.
That’s fair, but are you sure the top line number cited in the article reflects your definition? Maybe it does, I don’t know.
I am also sceptical of the the inclusion of philosophers and neuro scientists in your list of fields. I would speculate employment of such specialists represents an infinitely tiny portion of total employment in AI/ML industry (however you define that).
I am happy to be proven wrong. The topic of employment dynamics in AI/ML is not an area I am familiar with
AI research is very complex and includes several fields, like AI programming experts, linguistic experts, neuro scientists and philosophy. These people are highly specialized in their field, and it is a field of scientific study. Scientific AI research today is a combination of several scientific fields.
That’s fair, but are you sure the top line number cited in the article reflects your definition? Maybe it does, I don’t know.
I am also sceptical of the the inclusion of philosophers and neuro scientists in your list of fields. I would speculate employment of such specialists represents an infinitely tiny portion of total employment in AI/ML industry (however you define that).
I am happy to be proven wrong. The topic of employment dynamics in AI/ML is not an area I am familiar with