I feel like that comparison is a bit skewed, given that the original house (sudo, without the rs) was never torn down.
Furthermore, rather than something easily replaceable or shallow, the language used is pretty integral to the software. Rather than paint, it would be like the building is made with untreated timber for framing. There might be termites that threaten the integrity of the building.
If the building is unimportant you may not bother with the cost. But if it is somewhat important, reconstructing with better materials could be worth it even if new mistakes could be made during construction.
I feel like that comparison is a bit skewed, given that the original house (sudo, without the rs) was never torn down.
Furthermore, rather than something easily replaceable or shallow, the language used is pretty integral to the software. Rather than paint, it would be like the building is made with untreated timber for framing. There might be termites that threaten the integrity of the building.
If the building is unimportant you may not bother with the cost. But if it is somewhat important, reconstructing with better materials could be worth it even if new mistakes could be made during construction.