• osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Only if we let it be. There’s no technical reason why the origin of a video couldn’t have a signature generated by the capture device, or legally requiring AI models to do the same for any content they generate. Anything without an origin sticker is assumed to be garbage by default. Obviously there would need to be some way to make captures either anonymous or not at the user’s choice, and nation states can evade these things with sufficient effort like they always do, but we could cut a lot of slop out by doing some simple stuff like that.

    • kinsnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      while a phone signing a video to show that it was captured with the camera is possible, it will be easy too to fake the signature. all it would take would be a hacked device to steal the private key. and even if apple/google/samsung have perfectly secure systems to sign the origin of the video, there would be ton of cheaper phones that would likely won’t.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “Legally” doesn’t mean shit if it’s not enforceable. Besides, removing watermarks is trivial.

      There is no technically rigorous way to filter AI content, unfortunately.