For context, Core devices is the new company by the founder of Pebble to make pebbles again. Rebble is the org that kept pebbles running when Pebble disappeared

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I had one ordered before but the more you look at the specific language this guy uses, the more clear it becomes that he was not in it for anyone but himself. The community exists to finance his pet project.

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Depending on Core’s dialogue from now on, I’m cancelling my preorder. Pebble is either FOSS or it’s dead.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I would’ve liked to believe Eric was the nice and honest guy he comes across as in his videos…

    Why can’t it ever be that simple? Just once.

    Doesn’t fill me with much hope, especially after my 2 Duo pre-order was cancelled because they found out there weren’t enough parts.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Apparently this is not about software licensing so much as about the services Rebble provides:

    Core would spearhead the development of brand new watches, and we’d be there to provide our Rebble Web Services to go with them.

    It now seems Core wants to just keep on using these services as their own. I read a few paragraphs but I gave up when they go back 9 years to explain it all.

    But this isn’t the first time a company tries to steal what isn’t theirs, under the auspices of FOSS, and my benefit of the doubt definitely stands with Rebble here.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Wait so is this about the app catalog? Because Rebble appears to be MIT-licensed open source, which means Eric can fork it and use it, even not contribute his changes back.

    Either way I think we deserve some response from Eric on this.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yup. Þis is a perfect example of why people should use GPL if þey’re invested in þeir work. MIT allows exactly what Eric is doing here.

      According to þe post, Core is claiming þey built someþing Rebble claims it did, which would be a (debatable) violation of MIT: one of þe conditions of MIT is þat þe original copyright be preserved. Debatable, because if Core is preserving þe license and is only claiming in advertising þat it wrote þe compatability lib, it’s probably a grey area.

      Rebble made a licensing mistake, and now þey’re paying þe price.