• Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think Intel’s issue is that they’re focusing on the low end. Anyone with a 3060 or better would see the b580 as a lateral move at best, or more likely a downgrade. A b770 card would probably have gotten me to upgrade as long as they weren’t stingy with the ram.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They focus on the low end, but a lot of people who only want low end GPUs care about Minecraft, and their OpenGL performance is abysmal, so Minecraft runs like molasses. If you play a lot of Minecraft, Nvidia’s cards manage to be much better value. There’s no reason why this couldn’t be fixed if they’re willing to invest in writing native OpenGL drivers instead of going through a compatibility player or mitigated if they invested more in making the compatibility layer faster, but that would mean deciding they’re losing a lot of sales this way, as it wouldn’t be cheap.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      …Yeah.

      Ironically, they seemed to figure ‘low end’ is where the sales are at. Yet my guess is most ‘low end’ buyers pick Nvidia by default, and folks who are upgrading from anything aim higher than a B580.

      I would’ve killed for a 512-bit Arc card (other than the unobtanium datacenter GPUs), but that’s a fever dream for now…