For one month beginning on October 5, I ran an experiment: Every day, I asked ChatGPT 5 (more precisely, its “Extended Thinking” version) to find an error in “Today’s featured article”. In 28 of these 31 featured articles (90%), ChatGPT identified what I considered a valid error, often several. I have so far corrected 35 such errors.
Yeah, better to use grokpedia /s
I know this is sarcasm, but in case people don’t know.
Oh Jesus Christ no. At least Wikipedia has some form of oversight from multiple sources and people.