• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

    There’s a massive difference between asking if something is fake, and telling it it is and asking why.

    A person would make the same type of guesses and explanations if given the same task.

    All this is showing is, you and ALOT of other people just don’t know enough about AI to be able to have a conversation about it.

    It even says “suggests” in it, it’s making no claim that it’s real or fake. The lack of basic comprehension is the issue here.

    • Weslee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think if a person were asked to do the same they would actually look at the image and make genuine remarks, look at the points it has highlighted, the boxes are placed around random points and the references to those boxes are unrelated (ie. yellow talks about branches when there are no branches near the yellow box, red talks about bent guardrail when the red box on the guardrail is of an undamaged section)

      It has just made up points that “sound correct”, anyone actually looking at this can tell there is no intelligence behind this

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Why would it have to? It and the person doing the task already knows to do any task put in front of it. It’s one of a hundred photos for all it and the person knows.

        You are extending context and instructions that doesn’t exist. The situation would be, both are doing whatever task is presented to them. A human asking would fail and be removed. They failed order number one.

        You could also setup a situation where the ai and human were both capable of asking. The ai won’t do what it’s not asked, that’s the comprehension lacking.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          When people use a conversational tool, they expect it to act human, which it INTENTIONALLY DOES but without the sanity of a real human.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

      No. Stop making things up to complain about. Or at least leave me out of it.

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Then what are doing? Complaining it did exactly what you instructed it to do?

        What else did you expect?

        I get circle jerking against ai is hip and fun, but this isn’t even one of the valid errors it makes. This is just pure human error lmfao.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          clearly, they asked it a question that average joe would do, and has shown that again its full of overly confident lies. it did not just reinforce the original belief of the user that it is fake, but it also hallucinated there a bunch of professional-like statements that are false if you take the time to check them. most people won’t check them though, and straight up believe what it just spit out and think “oh this is so smart! outrageous that people call me dumb for asking it life advice!”