Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.

On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.

As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Okay in case this was not entirely clear, this isnt my opinion, supposedly evident from the term devils advocate. I was merely illustrating the thought processes involved in making women a bigger political priority than trans people.

    Leave it to lemmy to read everything in the most antagonistic way possible. Really getting fucking tired of this place

    • onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      making women a bigger political priority than trans people

      Because trans people are famously not “women” or “men”, they’re simply “trans”.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Leave it to lemmy to read everything in the most antagonistic way possible. Really getting fucking tired of this place

        Are you trying to prove me right? Lmao

        Since i apparently need to justify every fucking grammar choice i made on the shitter, i opted for the terms “trans people” and “women” as a matter of expediency and under the assumption the reader would be making a good faith effort to interpret the words as context suggests.

        Also, way to ignore entirely what i said for an opportunity to bitch about phrasing.

    • onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      this isnt my opinion, supposedly evident from the term devils advocate

      “I’m just spreading blatant bigotry under the guise of someone’s thought process, why do people think I’m an asshole??? These freak lefties are such snowflakes.”

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Okay my friend, lets start at the beginning:

        • someone asks, in a thread about misogyny, why the british government doesnt instead do something trans related first before caring about the cis women
        • i respond with the most common and pragmatic political reasons not to do so
        • some twat accuses me of being a bigot over this
        • i point out that i merely responded
        • the twat doubles down on hostile accusations
        • we are here 👈

        Can we move on now?