Thoughts?

Is this imperialism by China, a country which is supposed to be left-wing? Leftists are normally anti-imperialism. Wouldn’t it be better to let Taiwan democratically decide whether they want to be part of China or not?

    • Aljernon@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Xi’s claim to legitimacy is based on the threat of violence. The President of Taiwan’s legitimacy is based on being chosen by the people. It’s called Consent; something the Beijing regime has always lacked and been indifferent to.

        • Aljernon@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And not winning any elections doesn’t give Xi Jinping any claim to mainland China either.

            • Aljernon@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              Being a conqueror doesn’t give you a legitimate claim to anything. We decided a century ago to leave that Imperialism bullshit in the past but I guess some people can’t let it go.

              • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                What we as we want and what is real are two different things. We do business and perform politics with many authoritarians and will continue with no end in sight. Some of us live in reality.

                • Aljernon@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  We do business and perform politics with many authoritarians

                  And that’s exactly why the world can’t have nice things.

                  • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    I’m finding it difficult to continue because you’ve abandoned political analysis for moral truisms. We began by discussing the objective sources of legitimacy and statehood, but you’ve retreated into a ‘Gish Gallop’ of emotional appeals.

                    Whether or not you like a regime’s methods doesn’t change the reality of its statehood or its control over a territory. Since you’re no longer engaging with the central argument of how states actually function in reality, there’s nowhere left for this conversation to go.