I see a project of the United States reasserting dominance over what it has historically considered its sphere of influence. MAGA’s Project 2025 considered “re-hemisphering” as a necessity to guarantee US supply chains and economic dominance. The recently released National Security Strategy also considered a rebranding of the Monroe Doctrine to guarantee US control over the region’s strategic resources.

Under this scenario, it seems Washington will attempt to crush independent projects not aligned with its purposes. We have seen interventionism in elections such as the ones in Argentina or Honduras. We have seen threats and coercion even against nonradical, progressive projects such as in Colombia, Brazil, or Mexico. More revolutionary projects like Venezuela and Cuba are direct targets of aggression.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Deviation from the edict is breaking it’s terms.

    Yeah and I don’t think the American people want to deviate from the edict. I think a majority of us support the edict, either tacitly or explicitly. I think they want our country to have ultimate control over the resources of the Western hemisphere. And maybe the world, at least eventually.

    • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume there are some misplaced words here. The first two sentences don’t gel with your last two sentences.

        • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Your sentence about control over the Western hemisphere implies that the majority of Americans are pro-imperialist. The start and end of your post feel at odds.

          Monroe Doctrine, (December 2, 1823), cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy enunciated by Pres. James Monroe in his annual message to Congress. Declaring that the Old World and New World had different systems and must remain distinct spheres, Monroe made four basic points: (1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.

          • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Your sentence about control over the Western hemisphere implies that the majority of Americans are pro-imperialist.

            Aren’t they?

            The Monroe doctrine has evolved since 1823. It has been invoked or used as inspiration or justification for US involvement, solicited or unsolicited, in the political and economic affairs of several countries in Central and South America, especially those with socialist governments.

            • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I guess the way I understood the original intent was that we were attempting to set up a bulwark against further expansion from European colonialism. That’s how it was taught to me.

              I don’t think the average American citizen wants hemispheric domination.

              • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I guess the way I understood the original intent was that we were attempting to set up a bulwark against further expansion from European colonialism.

                That was the original intent. That is absolutely true. But the doctrine has evolved or expanded since. One major addition was the Roosevelt Corollary, right around the turn of the 20th century.

                The corollary states that the United States could intervene in the internal affairs of Latin American countries if they committed flagrant wrongdoings that “loosened the ties of civilized society.”

                Eventually, the “wrongdoings” came to include anything related to the “spread of communism.”

                I don’t think the average American citizen wants hemispheric domination.

                That’s probably true, but some Americans absolutely do want that, and many of those people are a part of Trump’s political coalition. This new enhanced version of the Roosevelt Corollary is sometimes called the “Donroe Doctrine” or the “Trump Corollary.”

                • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Gotcha. Thanks for the reminder about the Roosevelt Corrollary. It somehow slipped away.

                  As for the 33% cult, I do not expect a damned thing from them.