• saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      They never existed because we never had a real international police to enforce them. They kinda felt real because the US kinda acted like this police.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Laws are threats made by the dominant socioeconomic-ethnic group in a given nation. It’s just the promise of violence that’s enacted and the police are basically an occupying army. You know what I mean?

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, exactly, and if the USA can do what they please why should other countries comply with it? It creates a dangerous precedent and an example for other authoritarian regimes. And I am afraid that Venezuela is just the beginning.

        • BoJackHorseman@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Venezuela is not the beginning. America has always been a terrorist state. You just have the memory of a goldfish.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Everybody with nukes does as the please. US, Russia, China, North Korea, Israel…

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Everyone who abuses their power suffers economic repercussions at a minimum, militaristic repurcussions via the funding and arming of their opponents in some cases, but the precedent here being set is China asking “if the world won’t defend you, why should you defend the world?” It’s a dangerous warmongering idea that unfortunately might be taking root.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              The US hasn’t really suffered any serious consequences, yet. Similar to China. Russia didn’t until Ukraine, before that they messed in Chechnya, Georgia, etc with impunity. I don’t see anyone coming to the aid of Tibet or the uyghurs either, China is pretty scot free.

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Very very minor. Some strongly worded letters and symbolic sanctions. They could have kept crimea and most of the donbas and in a decade things would have gone back to normal.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        So the thing about Iraq is that:

        1. Bush enacted the NATO articles after 9-11 but couldn’t prove which country was responsible so while the troops were rallied there was no actual NATO response just voluntary support.

        2. Bush, Cheney, and the CIA managed to grub up a bunch of images of Aluminium Tubes that the CIA swore up and down were used in the production of nuclear weapons, and this case was presented to Congress to gain support for the war.

        3. The same arguments were presented to the UN prior to the invasion.

        Comparing Trump’s weekend getaway trip to that is disingenuous to its core, congress and largely the American people had absolutely no part to play in his insanity, and normalizing it or pretending there won’t or shouldn’t be repercussions for that helps nobody except for Donald Trump.

        • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is a childish and wrong way of understanding politics. “Orange man bad”, although a true statement, doesn’t explain USA geopolitics, which are largely bipartisan.

          You say congress played no part, yet most of congress (even most democrats) don’t condemned the actions themselves, only the lack of protocol followed. Half of EU politicians are celebrating too.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I myself don’t condemn the action itself, Maduro had it coming and so do all the other anti-democratic despots of the world. I place the greater good of all future people above my own comfort.

            But Trump should be punished just as any other president should, this is not their power to do.

            • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The entire purpose of economic sanctions on Venezuela is to prevent free elections, because free elections gave rise to the Bolivarian revolution. This is not me making it up, this is literally the US policy as said by themselves with economic sanctioning:

              1. The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent).

              2.There is no effective political opposition.

              3.Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence.

              4.Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate.

              5.Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause.

              6.The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship.

              If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.

              By arguing about elections without taking sanctions into account, you’re just being a CIA stooge

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I can’t tell if you’re being facetious of if you actually think Venezuela is Cuba? After Cuba aligned with the USSR at the height of the cold war and became a single party dictatorship, economic suppression seems like a tame response. You realize they almost set off WWIII?

                I feel like support for Castro would plummet harshly if any opposition were allowed on it’s soil, but it was not.

                • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  The document: Cubans are overwhelmingly in support of communism, so we need to starve them

                  The most “democratic” westerner: OF COURSE WE STARVED THEM, THEY DIDN’T HAVE TWO PARTIES

                  Just so you know: US + EU economic sanctions have murdered 38 million people in the past 50 years, and continue to murder half a million yearly. “Tame suppression”

                  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    Starved? They were primarily an agricultural economy. Maybe if Castro grew something other than Tobacco less people would have died, idk why every communist country has this dumb initiation ritual where they kill off large sums of their own people.

                    BTW it says the opposite of support for revolution. The USA caused their revolution and gained them self-governance before they CHOSE to live under Castro’s dictatorship.