• GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s like I tell everyone else that gets harassed, sexually or non-sexually: go tell a lawyer, not HR.

  • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    This doesn’t surprise me. I know a gal who reported retaliation at Google and was immediately put on a secret HR blacklist that prevented her from getting above a certain perf rating. She was later “laid off” without cause.

    She recorded her chat with HR, and this is a direct quote from the HR person: “Oh, that’s not retaliation. That’s a very specific legal construct. It sounds like what your manager is doing is more like retribution.”

  • PaddleMaster@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s easier to shun problematic women from society (in this case fire her) than to educate and hold men accountable on how women are not objects, nor property.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because “Google employee probably fired after Google acknowledges she was telling the truth about sexual harassment” isn’t quite as PC of a headline

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s used outside of UK too. I’ve seen it used in the US, for example. Usually it’s just a corporate term that says “you’re fired” but without saying that. They use terms like these all the time to try not to take accountability for fucking someone’s life up.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, but this is a BBC article and they don’t say laid off they say “made redundant”, its not a sanitizer term in UK, it is just the legal term everyone goes by for when you lose your job.

          • lucas@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s not quite true, it’s a very specific reason for losing your job. If you are fired for doing a bad job, and said you were made redundant, that would be a lie. Redundancy is about the role, not the individual.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              Yes that’s why I said Laid off not fired. Laid off is about the role no longer being needed

      • lucas@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s not quite the same thing. If you are ‘fired’ that’s generally to do with performance or conduct of the individual. Redundancy is about not needing (or affording) the role any more (i.e. it is redundant). There are specific legal protections for each case that work quite differently. (You cannot rehire for the same position after a redundancy, for example)