• Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I thought this for a long time. However currently I am no longer convinced. The production is so far decoupled from the consumer and often investor (or otherwise) dependant. So the consumer doesn’t really necessarily have the chance to support a good company nor do good things need to be offered.

    I short: eat the rich and reform the stock market.

    It’s long time propaganda pushing the fault to the consumer (e. G. Footprint invented. By oil companies)

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yes, yes, yes.

      And drastically reform or reimagine all the IP laws.

      Copyright: 5 years, one optional 5 year extension.

      Patents: 5 years, no extensions. No business methods, no algorithms, no gene expressions.

      Owned only by the individual humans and groups of humans. Cannot be owned by trusts, funds, corporations, estates. Cannot outlive the last human owner in a group.

      All licensing is non-exclusive only! All licensing is irreversible (once you license out the patent non-exclusively, no way to halt midway through the licensing term).

      That way pattents cannot be hoarded by the patent troll entities. Since all exclusive agreements are forbidden, no way to corner the market! Inventors are free to license their inventions all over and cannot be strong armed into an exclusive deal.

      In other words, ownerships, paywalls, and corporate control must be severely curtailed.