• Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why does he think anyone care what he thinks? Let’s hear the opinions of someone who hasn’t vested their entire company’s interests into this thing. The utter gall! He’s not interested in society one iota; only himself. Stop interviewing this arsehole!

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Maybe if the majority agrees on something, you should pay attention instead of doubling down. We know this tech is to put us all broke and give your class of rich fucks the best life at our expense.

    Eat the rich.

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    for the average Joe (people outside of lemmy) it’s hard to be positive towards ai when it increases the price of their general purpose compute. it’s also difficult to be supportive of it when all it does is inaccurately plagiarize and threaten to take away peoples jobs (although we know it can’t really replace anyone as the tech isn’t reliable and needs constant attention)

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yea, my next ideo cadd will ne a Radeon. If I can ever afford to upgrade my PC again. Fuck AI.

  • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Hey guys, I think the guy who stands to make a mint on all this AI stuff has a point, we should be nicer to the plagiarism machine

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think he’s more concerned about losing a mint, which is probably the more likely result.

  • MortUS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If he wants to ease peoples minds of AI then he should be advocating to regulate it so we can know it’s not being used in harmful ways. Regulation and transparency (to a degree).

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    How, fuckass. How.

    Also i don’t think you are aware, but society is people.

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Lol. Negativity around AI has done damage, but draining water and electricity in magnitude not seen before has not?

    P-lease

    • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not to mention there is no answer to the elephant in the room… What happens to an economy where workers have been stripped of yet more jobs and all of manufacturing is in China?

      Oh, sorry. Is it negative to talk about the needs of millions of people and not our thoughtful billionaire class?

      Let’s also not mention the potential data collection/spyware-esque potential. Noooo, that’d never happen. More negativity in my imagination. I should go get a prescription for that…

      • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        With you at every step.

        Oh, and about that prescription. I know an old French prescription that would suit our needs just fine