It’s very nice to not have a dozen different versions of the same distro to parse through and figure out that are simply the same distro with a different DE. Moreover, very few of them offer this many options.

Cachy could be doing a better job explaining what the user is looking at here and who each of these is for. Pretty easy to sum up in 1-2 sentences…

  • artyom@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    CachyOS only has 2 ISOs, both of which are very clear in their purpose (Desktop and Handheld). Not 4 different ISOs with no clear delineation to speak of.

    If you read the OP I also said:

    Cachy could be doing a better job explaining what the user is looking at here and who each of these is for. Pretty easy to sum up in 1-2 sentences…

    • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sure, but presenting DE choice inside the install will confuse the mythical new user.

      But I agree with you. A lot of download bandwidth and hosting storage could be saved by doing what Cachy/Endeavour ISO’s are doing.

      • artyom@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        The new user often has to choose their DE regardless. This just moves it from the webpage where they’re presented with 3 or 4 different “distros” with different names for some reason, all under the same ISO, which I would argue is far less confusing (especially if presented with the relevant information during the install).