• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Capitalism is a threat to democracy.

    But thanks for getting on nearly the same page, Oxfam.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      Most -ism’s are the problem, every hericarical civilization throughout all of sapien time has collapsed, destroyed the local enviorment etc. Inequality is the issue.

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We’ve been pointing this out ever since the concept of currency became a thing, but I’m sure we will learn our lesson this time and stop doing it. This can’t just be how it will always be until we drive ourselves to extinction stuck on this miserable rock, Right?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Structural issues make egalitarian economic systems difficult. Wealth and social influence compound once another in a virtuous cycle. Wealth has a strong hereditary bias, even in socialist economic models. And violence is historically a powerful tool for accruing wealth. Very difficult to establish universal deterrence against violence.

      This isn’t a question of people being smart or stupid. It’s an elaborate balancing act that becomes exponentially more difficult as population size expands.

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hey, the rock is fine, we’ve made society a miserable place. The pack is calling me…

      • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Not a very good actor, but seems like a good person and he’s funny. He worked hard to be where he is so sure “the rock” is fine.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You mean letting a small group of people consolidate power under themselves is a danger to a system designed to evenly distribute power? No way!

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Screw Idiocracy. People reference it not understanding there were positives in the negatives. This is “Don’t Look Up”, that nailed our current corrupt leadership and techno-corporate lunacy, as well as ignoring what is right in front of us because shiny things are more interesting.

  • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I believe Plato pointed this out in The Republic.

    He thought the richest citizen needed to have no more then 5x the wealth of the poorest citizen or you would inevitably slide into oligarchy.

    • nuxi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We crossed that threshold so long ago that you can make 5x the poverty level and still not be able to afford a house.

      • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Well 5x0 is 0 so yeah. This sounds like a good system though. Desperate for that Billion clout? Make sure everyone else has 200mil first.

        • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          0 isn’t real, it is a social construct created by big math.

          You add by 0 and its still the same… what?

          You subtract by 0 and its still the same… why?

          You multiply by 0 and you BECOME 0, the heck?

          You divide by 0 and its… big not even a number just a concept… sure buddy!

  • sisyphus@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I suspect the only time the US got close to representative government was the New Deal era. Most people just live their lives and don’t think in ideological terms. The ones that do are considered “too into politics” and usually believe in reform because it requires less of them than the alternative. Anyways, how about that bread and circuses?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So when are we going tondo what about this?

    This. Has. To. Stop.

    We cannot allow a single person or family to control a single news organization, let alone multiple. Anyone who thought that was a good or even okay idea has been, and continues to be, delusional.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They own so much more than the news organizations. They own the special interest groups, the lobbyists, the elected officials, the land and natural resources, every single company we buy goods and services from, the banks, the hospitals, everything. Slavery didn’t end, it just changed its business model.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s not that they are rich, we’ve always had rich people. The problem is that we now have rich people with enough wealth to compete with nations, and they are getting even stronger. They are now starting to cut their own deals with nations that benefit them personally, with no regard to the nations, and millions of people that could be harmed by that policy. We’ve already seen Musk manipulate Starlink to steer a war in his direction, and unleash his hacking squad to rig an American election, just so he could use the opportunity to cripple all the government agencies that were investigating his crimes.

    And it will only get worse. They are approaching Trillionaire status, and will be even more powerful. How long before multiple trillionaires form an alliance, and build their own personal military?

    Eventually we will reach a point where it will become impossible to reign them in, and then we will all wonder why someone didn’t do something about them when it was still possible, like NOW.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There already are private military. Black Water and alike are absolutely private armies. But that could be expensive, even for trillionaires. It’s a much better strategy to privatize the existing military and get it paid by the government. Watch it, it’s going to happen!

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      And it will only get worse. They are approaching Trillionaire status, and will be even more powerful. How long before multiple trillionaires form an alliance, and build their own personal military?

      Doesn’t Amazon or someshit literally already employ a PMC as their “loss protection” unit?

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        approaching Trillionaire status

        Arguably long already there, when considering the bankers who control the fates (and [mis]fortunes) of all nations.

  • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yeah, this isn’t anything new. Literally centuries old analysis here. I guess it’s nice they updated it for the contemporary society, though.

  • Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The sky also happens to be blue. That gotta be news too.

    Edit: Okay, having read the summary, it seems like they have proved causality between growing economic inequality and democratic backsliding. Which yeah, most people could have guessed, but now we have a fancy bunch of paper that says so.